Bruce Wszechwiedzący :)
Red Sox Waiting For Teams To Begin Selling - RealGM Wiretap
The Boston Red Sox may look to add pitching before the non-waiver trade deadline asics gel lyte 3 pas cher , but teams will have to begin selling in order to make a deal happen.
"We'll see. This is the time where you're looking -- nobody's got a perfect club," Dave Dombrowski said. "We have a good club, nobody has a perfect club. We all have eyes on particular things you may look to do to improve your team and we'll be like that too."
There are still a number of teams in striking distance of contention, which limits the number of sellers on the market.
"I think there’s an uptick on conversations that take place," Dombrowski said. "But a lot of times the conversations now are just as much an informational, feeling out (type). And I think it's also a situation where a lot of clubs really haven’t decided what they're going to do yet. ... There's a handful of clubs where almost from day one of the season are already looking toward 2017. And some of those clubs have already traded some of their players. Those handful of clubs really haven't changed a great deal.
"I have a sense that even though you may look at the standings and say asics gel lyte france , 'Well, this club will probably look towards next year,' there’s not a great number of those at this time. ... We get toward the All-Star break and you’re almost forced to make decisions. And clubs like to, as much as they can, put that off as far as possible.
"It’s important for us to stay in contact with those organizations so we know when they shift their focus."
rney. The attorney asks who knows the parties. He asks if anyone knows the attorneys. He asks if anyone has been involved in a similar business dispute. He follows up by asking whether anything about that experience would prevent the juror from being fair and impartial in this case. Then he turns to me and asks, ?Okay acheter asics gel lyte , who do we want?? Well gosh, I don?t know. I haven?t learned a thing about any of these folks. I?ve watched dozens of attorneys do voir dire and for the more often than not, I see it done badly. I?m not sure if voir dire and jury selection strategy are routinely taught as part of trial advocacy programs in our nation?s law schools or not; if they are, they?re not being taught well. And as I?ve grimaced my way through bad voir dire after bad voir dire, I?ve come to realize that the main reason for bad voir dire comes down to one word: fear. WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF? It seems that attorneys are afraid of three things when they stand up to speak to prospective jurors in voir dire: 1. Fear of losing control; 2. Fear of a juror poisoning the panel; 3. Fear of jurors actually talking. So in response to these fears, I see attorneys make these same three mistakes over and over: 1. Talking too much; (and thus listening too little); 2. Not asking the tough questions; 3. Not following up enough. CALMING THE FEAR Here?s the thing: just because someone says something bad about your client asics gel lyte evo noir , doesn?t mean that everyone else in the room will automatically agree with it. Now, if some members of the panel think ill of your client because he?s Muslim, or because she was the second wife of a wealthy decedent or he did inhale, wouldn?t you want to know about it before the trial, instead of after? And what if most everyone does agree with something bad a prospective juror says about your client? GREAT! BREAK THE PANEL!! There are more jurors where those came from, and if there aren?t asics gel kayano 20 femme pas cher , you?ve got a mistrial motion. That might not be an appetizing prospect if you?re, say, plaintiff?s counsel and you?ve got a lot invested in the case, but what is more unappetizing is being poured out on the table by a panel of jurors who don?t like your client and you didn?t know it. HOW TO FIX IT 1. In preparing for jury selection, first develop a fear list?what are the vulnerabilities of your case, of your client? 2. From the fear list asics onitsuka tiger mexico 66 noir , develop voir dire questions that will ferret out unfriendly attitudes. 3. Be willing to ask the tough questions; there are ways to ask them gently (?Is there anyone on the panel who is a bigot?? usually doesn?t generate a lot of response), but you have to get it out there. And DON?T ask it this way: ?Will anyone here hold it against my client because she was the second wife of a wealthy decedent?? You need to discover their attitudes about family disputes, their experiences with stepparents, their beliefs about the motivations of people when they are called upon to share an inheritance. Once you get to those attitudes, you?ll reveal the folks who won?t like your client because she?s the second wife. 4. Follow up with open ended questions: ?Tell us more about that?? ?Tell us why you feel that way?? ?How long have you felt this way?? (Note: ?How long have you felt this way? is a great question that can seal off the juror from attempted rehabilitation by opposing counsel or by the judge. If you can demonstrate a long-held belief it makes your challenge for cause more compelling) 5. Ask if other jurors agree with the unfriendly juror and let them speak their minds, too. 6. Most importantly asics onitsuka tiger mexico 66 homme , as my colleague David Ball says, ?Shut Up and Listen.? Now hopefully before you ever enter the courtroom you?ve done some pre-trial research (mock trial, focus group) and have had a chance to develop a profile of favorable and unfavorable juror characteristics?demographic, experiential and attitudinal. Doing the research ahead of time does wonders to reduce uncertainty. Ultimately, it?s okay to cede some control during the voir dire process. It?ll help build rapport with the jurors and it will get you where you need to go in terms of finding out who is on your panel. Still worried about losing control? Focus on self-contr.
|Skocz na górę|
Powered by InfinityForum
Copyright ©DACHY.org 2003 - 2006